Rahziel's Replies

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 129 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Text errors #18900
    Avatar photoRahziel
    Participant

    disappear

    in reply to: Paul´s Art Corner #18851
    Avatar photoRahziel
    Participant

    Well, that’s a Bandit Raider’s helmet called Nasal Helmet With Rusty Mail, except here it have fluffy ponytail..
    Would be cool to add this modification as a unique helm of a Bandit Leader, if it’s not already there.

    in reply to: Morale Checks While Stunned? #18849
    Avatar photoRahziel
    Participant

    Then they realise that they’re f*cked and begin shitting bricks..
    After that they can try to scavenge some weapons someone had before, or hide behind the trees and continue shitting bricks.

    in reply to: Map locations toggle #18840
    Avatar photoRahziel
    Participant

    Won’t that bring a new set of problems?
    Like being unable to see what’s underneath all the banners littered all over the map when you zoom out and banners ‘grow in size’ ?

    As the original intention of the request was to be able to see the map clearly without any obstruction, be it name tags or banners, changing one for the other won’t solve it. Even if it’s not a UI button but a simple hotkey, I would like to have an ability to turn off just banners/names or all UI overlay altogether leaving only the map.

    If it would allow us to switch between differents sets of things we could see, then even better.

    in reply to: Morale Checks While Stunned? #18828
    Avatar photoRahziel
    Participant

    The only trouble with that is that orc young and berserkers can stun automatically, without even doing any damage.

    They stun only if they ‘hit‘ with their charge skill, but if it’s a ‘miss‘, then no stun applies. So it’s ok as it is – good base defence or shieldwall and you’re safe.

    If we assume the stun here is like being disoriented or just breaking a posture enough to drop riposte/shield/spearwall, then the mercenary still can hear and see what happened around him, so morale check should work as usual.

    in reply to: Advice on Direwolves #18826
    Avatar photoRahziel
    Participant

    Don’t take hits – feed ’em spears!
    Riposte has -10% hitchance without mastery, also you need high melee defence for it to work (enemy must attack and miss, but on day 4 you’ll hardly have decent melee defence), and in the end you will strike back only 3 times if all hits from a direwolf miss.
    Spearwall on the other hand don’t require you to even have a shield to work (if you’re too poor, but it’s a risky gamble), and it will inflict as much as 6 hits since direwolves have 12 ap (thus 6 moves), while denying their ability to hurt your men. Also it does more morale checks and make ’em flee sooner.
    Lastly, crossbows and bows only good until they can be used without aim obstruction penalty, after that they’re a hindrance.

    So once the battle starts and the direwolves didn’t reach your frontline – spearwall and let ’em come.
    If some of them did reach melee range – shieldbash or push away with pitchforks, and then spearwall..

    in reply to: Morale Checks While Stunned? #18810
    Avatar photoRahziel
    Participant

    I’d say dodging an attack in stunned state is even more unrealistic, but it happens all the time nonetheless..

    in reply to: Text errors #18794
    Avatar photoRahziel
    Participant

    feriouciously = ferociously

    in reply to: Dastard in Good Spirit = Confident? #18792
    Avatar photoRahziel
    Participant

    So is this working as intended?
    Shouldn’t the Dastard override any positive mood, as it states “Will start combat at wavering morale”, as opposed to a “..chance to start battle at confident morale”?

    in reply to: Text errors #18788
    Avatar photoRahziel
    Participant

    neighbors

    in reply to: Cleaver's tooltip – Bleeding dmg #18787
    Avatar photoRahziel
    Participant

    Then it should mention it in such a way as not to be misleading: “Inflicts N damage total over duration of N turns.”
    or “Inflicts N damage at the end of each turn for N turns if hit not stopped by armor.”

    Right now it says “damage over time” and that is associated with a damage inflicted per tick for as long as it lasts (be it 2 turns or 3 because of traits), well, for me at least.

    And a Perk mention it as ‘per turn‘ too, but Cleave skill’s tooltip does not. That’s where misunderstanding is coming from.

    in reply to: A few text errors #18782
    Avatar photoRahziel
    Participant

    I think there should be one more comma (or dash) to emphasize that the one talking corrects himself: “I said, no, I asked why..”

    in reply to: Reach the Advantage Perk #18769
    Avatar photoRahziel
    Participant

    Read this trait’s description carefully, in last part it says: “If you put away your weapon, you lose all stacks.”
    Switching weapon counts as ‘putting away’..

    in reply to: Dastard in Good Spirit = Confident? #18766
    Avatar photoRahziel
    Participant

    And the Finale…

    in reply to: Text errors #18702
    Avatar photoRahziel
    Participant

    statuette

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 129 total)